Posted in:

Comparing the Benefits and Drawbacks of Different Liquidity Providers

© by Getty images

There are a number of liquidity providers to choose from. Each has its advantages and disadvantages, so deciding which provider is best for your organization can be somewhat difficult. As a part of this blog post, we will look more closely at three of the most popular liquidity providers: banks, market makers, and electronic communication networks (ECNs). By comparing and contrasting each option, you can decide which one is right for you based on its advantages and disadvantages.

What Are Liquidity Providers, and Why Are They Important?

LPs are known as companies and individuals that provide capital to trading firms, investment banks, and other financial institutions. These companies offer liquidity by buying and selling securities on the market, thereby providing those institutions with the liquidity they need. In the absence of liquidity providers, such financial institutions would be unable to function, and the economy would be in a critical state.

The role of LPs is crucial due to the fact that they provide the capital that keeps the market active. If they were not present, trading would slow to a crawl, resulting in a weak economy.

Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase are two of the largest investment banks in the world, as are hedge funds and other financial institutions. They are involved in the trading of a variety of securities, such as stocks, bonds, and derivatives. 

Aside from providing the Forex market liquidity, these firms are also instrumental in accurately pricing assets. Through constant purchases and sales of securities in the market, they are able to offer the market a fair price for each security. In this way, investors are able to minimize the risk of overpaying for or underselling their assets.

Finally, the implementation of FX liquidity solutions also contributes to a reduction in market risk. They can protect other players in the market by buying and selling securities. Taking this precaution helps to provide stability to the market and ensure that investors are not taking unwarranted risks.

Therefore, now that we have an understanding of what liquidity providers (LPs) are and why they are important, let’s examine the three most popular types of liquidity providers: banks, market makers, and electronic communication networks.


Financial institutions, such as banks, are common types of LPs. They make a significant contribution to the overall liquidity of the market by actively buying and selling securities on the market. Liquidity is generally provided by banks through their trading desks. Normally these desks are staffed with traders trading securities in the market.

Banks often have a lot of capital available for them to employ when buying and selling assets on the market. This enables them to offer liquidity to the markets and supports price stability. Additionally, banks frequently have access to a wealth of information about the securities they trade, which aids in the appropriate valuation of assets.

Utilizing banks also has the benefit of lowering the danger of fire-sales. A bank may keep the securities it purchases in the market on its balance sheet for a while. Instead of selling the securities right away at a fire sale price, this allows the bank time to find a buyer for them at a fair price.

However, there are some disadvantages as well.

The first disadvantage is that liquidity providers like banks must maintain high capital ratios in order to provide liquidity. The reason for this is that each of their assets must be backed by a certain amount of capital. Whenever a bank’s capital levels drop below this level, it may have to sell assets, resulting in a sharp drop in market prices.

A second disadvantage is that they may have to comply with government regulations. Consequently, they may have difficulty providing market liquidity when regulations change.

Last but not least, banks are typically charged for their services. Over time, these fees can accumulate, making banks an increasingly expensive source of liquidity.

To conclude, banks are an excellent source of liquidity if they are regulated and well capitalized. Some investors, however, may not find them to be the best choice.

Market Makers

The term “market maker” refers to a financial institution which buys and sells securities on behalf of its clients and generates revenue by charging commissions. They are responsible for providing liquidity to the market by purchasing and selling securities on their own when no one else is willing to do so.

Among the benefits of market makers is that they are able to provide continuous liquidity to the market, which is vital to investors who require fast access to securities. Due to their willingness to buy and sell securities even when there is little demand from other investors, market makers also contribute to the stability of securities prices.

Through the process of buying and selling securities, they are able to provide a layer of protection for the other participants in the market. Getting this done is one of the best ways to guarantee that the markets remain stable and that investors are not taking on too much risk. Additionally, they contribute to the reduction of market risk.

They are also typically more affordable than banks in terms of fees. The reason for this is that they are not required to maintain high levels of capital.

The use of market makers also has some disadvantages.

Market makers are susceptible to manipulation, which is one of their disadvantages. It is possible for them to collide on prices because they trade often with each other.

Furthermore, they have the option of withdrawing from the market at any time. There may not be enough market makers willing to provide liquidity as a result, causing prices to drop substantially.

As a final point, market makers typically require a minimum level of capital before they begin trading. Smaller investors may have difficulty utilizing them as liquidity providers because of this.

In conclusion, the use of market makers can be beneficial in some circumstances, but they can also carry certain risks. When considering these liquidity providers, investors should carefully consider whether they are willing to assume these risks.


The term ECN refers to a network of electronic communications through which traders can trade directly with one another. In order to provide liquidity to the market, ECNs match buy and sell orders from different market participants.

One of the primary advantages of using an ECN as a liquidity provider is its ability to provide anonymity to its users. An ECN does not reveal the details of your trades to the rest of the market when you trade through it. Moreover, neither the trading activity nor the size of your order can be seen by other market participants.

Among the disadvantages of ECNs is the fact that they are only available during specific hours. As an example, NASDAQ ECN is only open from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST.

The downside of the product may also be that it provides a lower level of liquidity than other types of liquidity providers. The reason for this may be due to the fact that ECNs typically have fewer participants than other markets such as the  NYSE (New York Stock Exchange).

As the last point, ECNs generally require a minimum amount of capital in order to trade. Because of this, smaller investors may have difficulty using them as liquidity providers.

To summarize, ECNs can be beneficial, but they have some risks as well. Before utilizing them as their liquidity providers, investors should carefully consider whether they are willing to accept these risks.

Which Type of Liquidity Provider Is Right for You?

There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question, as it depends on your own personal preferences and needs. When you want your trading to be anonymous, you may have to choose an ECN. Nevertheless, if you are in search of lower fees, a market maker may be a better option.

Furthermore, it is imperative to take into account the amount of capital you have available for trading. In the event that you have a small amount of capital, an ECN may be an option for you. On the other hand, you may look at market makers in case you have more substantial amounts at your disposal.

To summarize all the said above, it should be said that the decision regarding which FX liquidity services to use ultimately rests with you. But before making a choice, it is important to consider your own personal needs and preferences.